chaserforum.net

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

All content is the responsibility of individual users. If concerned by any message, report it. Abuse not tolerated and will lead to banning. By using this site you agree to its rules.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 6

Author Topic: Chronicle of Scientific Statistical Analysis  (Read 2334 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Lord Biscuit©

  • Having a difficult time with reality
  • ****
  • Posts: 13346
  • Just finished "Gullivers Travels"- needs more salt
Chronicle of Scientific Statistical Analysis
« on: October 27, 2010, 09:54:11 AM »

Inspired by Neils 'not to scale' chart, I feel the need to archive insightful scientific offerings presented to the internets community so that Google may find them, and offer them up to the science communities of the world.


Biscuit analysis of right/wrong thinking at different ages.
Logged
for when you need to need to talk live, but not in person, and without emoticons.

Pinball Neil

  • Really not getting the hint
  • ********
  • Posts: 5635
Re: Chronicle of Scientific Statistical Analysis
« Reply #1 on: October 27, 2010, 10:03:59 AM »

You may regret this - I went to the Dunco Academy of Digital Art and my skills are at their peak.
Logged
No more sleepovers on the bathroom floor.

Truckarella

  • Post count only Fadeaway is sad enough to achieve without cheating
  • *
  • Posts: 8343
  • I thought 'jocks and jacket, that'll do.'
Re: Chronicle of Scientific Statistical Analysis
« Reply #2 on: October 27, 2010, 10:06:38 AM »

Yay!  Something amusing on the forum.

Lord Biscuit©

  • Having a difficult time with reality
  • ****
  • Posts: 13346
  • Just finished "Gullivers Travels"- needs more salt
Re: Chronicle of Scientific Statistical Analysis
« Reply #3 on: October 27, 2010, 11:02:35 AM »


Neils Personal Music Taste Analysis (not to scale)

I expect this will stand the test of time, but we'll check again in 20 years.
Logged
for when you need to need to talk live, but not in person, and without emoticons.

Nick 2

  • Having a difficult time with reality
  • ****
  • Posts: 12340
  • Waiting for Ragnarok
Re: Chronicle of Scientific Statistical Analysis
« Reply #4 on: October 27, 2010, 11:06:03 AM »

So the music they both like is neither awesome nor lame? Wtf?
« Last Edit: October 27, 2010, 11:09:42 AM by Nick 2 »
Logged

Truckarella

  • Post count only Fadeaway is sad enough to achieve without cheating
  • *
  • Posts: 8343
  • I thought 'jocks and jacket, that'll do.'
Re: Chronicle of Scientific Statistical Analysis
« Reply #5 on: October 27, 2010, 11:09:11 AM »

Pinball Neil

  • Really not getting the hint
  • ********
  • Posts: 5635
Re: Chronicle of Scientific Statistical Analysis
« Reply #6 on: October 27, 2010, 11:23:21 AM »

So the music they both like is neither awesome nor lame? Wtf?

It's all three. But not to scale.

btw, big fan of your paint work, Nick.
Logged
No more sleepovers on the bathroom floor.

Truckarella

  • Post count only Fadeaway is sad enough to achieve without cheating
  • *
  • Posts: 8343
  • I thought 'jocks and jacket, that'll do.'
Re: Chronicle of Scientific Statistical Analysis
« Reply #7 on: October 27, 2010, 11:27:47 AM »

Truckarella

  • Post count only Fadeaway is sad enough to achieve without cheating
  • *
  • Posts: 8343
  • I thought 'jocks and jacket, that'll do.'
Re: Chronicle of Scientific Statistical Analysis
« Reply #8 on: October 27, 2010, 11:30:02 AM »



By the by: I had an idea for a carb-neutral ice cream.
All you need is to freeze a pint of ice cream to -3706 F.
The energy it will take your system to bring the ice cream up to a digestible temperature is roughly 1,000 calories, neatly burning away all those carbohydrates from the fat and sugar.
The only snag is the Third Law of Thermodynamics, which says it’s impossible to go below -459 F.
Bummer.


OMG I LUV SCIENCE!

Truckarella

  • Post count only Fadeaway is sad enough to achieve without cheating
  • *
  • Posts: 8343
  • I thought 'jocks and jacket, that'll do.'
Re: Chronicle of Scientific Statistical Analysis
« Reply #9 on: October 27, 2010, 11:33:43 AM »

SPAMENCE!

Pinball Neil

  • Really not getting the hint
  • ********
  • Posts: 5635
Re: Chronicle of Scientific Statistical Analysis
« Reply #10 on: October 27, 2010, 11:36:40 AM »



That's not science, that's a business plan.  :cop:
Logged
No more sleepovers on the bathroom floor.

Truckarella

  • Post count only Fadeaway is sad enough to achieve without cheating
  • *
  • Posts: 8343
  • I thought 'jocks and jacket, that'll do.'
Re: Chronicle of Scientific Statistical Analysis
« Reply #11 on: October 27, 2010, 11:37:36 AM »

I don't care that this is for statistical analysis, some idea are just too important not to share

Nick 2

  • Having a difficult time with reality
  • ****
  • Posts: 12340
  • Waiting for Ragnarok
Re: Chronicle of Scientific Statistical Analysis
« Reply #12 on: October 27, 2010, 11:38:16 AM »

I was not aware that I contributed paint work

Repost plz
Logged

hammer

  • Post count only Fadeaway is sad enough to achieve without cheating
  • *
  • Posts: 9443
  • Count Von Hammer of the naughty bits
Re: Chronicle of Scientific Statistical Analysis
« Reply #13 on: October 27, 2010, 12:12:54 PM »

I think therefore I am,
so therefore I am, because I think
But what happens to me If I think I'm not?
Logged
.....Also a knife to the liver is a lot worse than the occasional beer every 5 minutes, so  :-P

Y'know - This is one of those moments I totally agree with AZ - That's the

Pinball Neil

  • Really not getting the hint
  • ********
  • Posts: 5635
Re: Chronicle of Scientific Statistical Analysis
« Reply #14 on: October 27, 2010, 12:19:38 PM »

Logged
No more sleepovers on the bathroom floor.
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 6