chaserforum.net

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

All content is the responsibility of individual users. If concerned by any message, report it. Abuse not tolerated and will lead to banning. By using this site you agree to its rules.

Poll

Should energy drinks go?

Yes, my kids are schizo
No, I will waste away to nothing
I don't give a shit
Fadeaway is a fuckwit

Pages: 1 [2]

Author Topic: But the law of conservation of energy says you can't destroy energy!  (Read 1570 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Wolfe Tone

  • Post count only Fadeaway is sad enough to achieve without cheating
  • *
  • Posts: 7513
  • Every single time I get high, I see mice.
Re: But the law of conservation of energy says you can't destroy energy!
« Reply #15 on: October 24, 2009, 05:16:13 PM »

Isn't that what that guarna shit is?
Logged
Studying laws I don't particularly agree with to give back to a society i don't particularly like.

Mephistopheles

  • Stalker
  • ******
  • Posts: 2659
  • If you look really hard you can see a boob
Re: But the law of conservation of energy says you can't destroy energy!
« Reply #16 on: October 24, 2009, 05:19:00 PM »

Hmm true point. Twice as much caffeine as coffee, I'm told.
Logged
Eat my virtual face!

Majorie

  • Resident Anti-Everything
  • Really not getting the hint
  • ********
  • Posts: 5371
Re: But the law of conservation of energy says you can't destroy energy!
« Reply #17 on: October 24, 2009, 10:33:00 PM »

I don't see how anyone could get hooked on these things. Whenever I have one I feel awful, all jittery, restless and anxious.
Logged

Frazzy?

  • Post count only Fadeaway is sad enough to achieve without cheating
  • *
  • Posts: 8422
  • Banjo Ninja
Re: But the law of conservation of energy says you can't destroy energy!
« Reply #18 on: October 24, 2009, 10:51:26 PM »

* frazzy clings to caffeine molecule
noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

Dark V is canned epic win.
Logged
You spoony bard!

Mephistopheles

  • Stalker
  • ******
  • Posts: 2659
  • If you look really hard you can see a boob
Re: But the law of conservation of energy says you can't destroy energy!
« Reply #19 on: October 25, 2009, 12:30:36 AM »

That it is. 8-)

And here's some tmi:
Normal V makes my vag taste really acidic and gross but dark V only makes it slightly acidic and so much richer like dark V.
Logged
Eat my virtual face!

Frazzy?

  • Post count only Fadeaway is sad enough to achieve without cheating
  • *
  • Posts: 8422
  • Banjo Ninja
Re: But the law of conservation of energy says you can't destroy energy!
« Reply #20 on: October 25, 2009, 12:45:18 AM »

good to know...
Logged
You spoony bard!

Thaluikhain

  • All too visible
  • *
  • Posts: 20339
Re: But the law of conservation of energy says you can't destroy energy!
« Reply #21 on: October 25, 2009, 12:50:37 AM »

Do I want to ask how you know that?
Logged

Bookworm.

  • Having a difficult time with reality
  • ****
  • Posts: 12178
  • Kneel, bitches
Re: But the law of conservation of energy says you can't destroy energy!
« Reply #22 on: October 25, 2009, 12:20:40 PM »

It's not self evident?
Logged
Looking to find a book.

Mephistopheles

  • Stalker
  • ******
  • Posts: 2659
  • If you look really hard you can see a boob
Re: But the law of conservation of energy says you can't destroy energy!
« Reply #23 on: October 25, 2009, 03:40:40 PM »

Appropriate self-disclosure is a social skill I lack. Evidently.
Logged
Eat my virtual face!

Bookworm.

  • Having a difficult time with reality
  • ****
  • Posts: 12178
  • Kneel, bitches
Re: But the law of conservation of energy says you can't destroy energy!
« Reply #24 on: October 25, 2009, 04:58:12 PM »

Forum's are hardly the place for the most socially able of society...
Logged
Looking to find a book.

Thaluikhain

  • All too visible
  • *
  • Posts: 20339
Re: But the law of conservation of energy says you can't destroy energy!
« Reply #25 on: October 25, 2009, 05:27:42 PM »

It's not self evident?

I meant, was this a proper and rigourous scientific study, with experiments repeated and no other variables?  Preferably independant confirmation as well.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]