chaserforum.net

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

All content is the responsibility of individual users. If concerned by any message, report it. Abuse not tolerated and will lead to banning. By using this site you agree to its rules.

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 11

Author Topic: Vote for your new mods  (Read 13591 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

.

  • Having a difficult time with reality
  • ****
  • Posts: 10923
Re: Vote for your new mods
« Reply #15 on: October 11, 2007, 09:57:47 AM »

Exactly. Most of the abuse on the forum is unnessecery, and there's no point in letting it continue if the only thing that it's 'achieving' is driving newcomers away from here.

but that's the *exact* reason we do it.

when we give people a bit of stick, it sorts the wheat from the chaff. the people with balls stick around and subsequently contribute (usually) half decent shit to conversations. so it's a baptism of fire...a rite of passage...and it's not like we're sodomising them with lit candles or anything like at Kings School :roll: we're telling them they're fucked for liking australian idol, ffs  :lol:

i have a real problem with this modern backlash against "bullying". i actually think it's a natural part of group dynamics that has existed since day dot. we all seem so shocked that bullying happens in so many spheres of life, but maybe that's the way it's meant to be? of course, there's an issue about the severity of said dynamic, but we've been groomed to be so hypersensitive to it that *anything* done to 'toughen us up' or prepare us for the culture of a particular group is swiftly dubbed bullying and the kum-bi-yah police come tapdancing in.

i'm not excusing *all* bullying. i'm just saying that the definition of the term has been so diluted that we're shrouding people in cotton wool and it's fucking shit.
Logged

LosE the Act cHildren

  • Groupie
  • **
  • Posts: 112
  • tasty goodness for the whole family
Re: Vote for your new mods
« Reply #16 on: October 11, 2007, 10:18:34 AM »

i don't agree with that at all yak

as I've already said, i viewed any general abuse regarding my "newbie" status as a rite of passage on this site.

BUT (wait... there's more!) bullying in real life is totally unacceptable. you seem to forget (or maybe you didn't) that people can be heartless cruel wankers. and it often doesn't "toughen you up", it just totally damages your self esteem.

don't worry, i know what bullying is like. I suffered it in school, and I now WORK at a school and  are disgusted with the things kids come up with. and its not just kids. there are teachers that throw around their weight in the staffroom.

i agree that the defintion of bullying has been broadened, and for good reason. we're only now realising the long term damage caused by emotional and psychological torment.

Just like the laws referring to stalking had to be widened to include stalking over mobile phone text messages, so do did the definition of bullying need to include all the ways of harassment that may have previously been overlooked (some examples may include rude text messages or incessant snide remarks)
Logged
"You're not sick, you're single!"

Chromefox

  • Stalker
  • ******
  • Posts: 3835
  • CRITICAL HIT!
Re: Vote for your new mods
« Reply #17 on: October 11, 2007, 10:34:15 AM »

Some kind of happy medium needs to be drawn where new users aren't getting curbstomped for illegitimate reasons, and the remaining users aren't asked to stop being themselves because some people don't take it the right way. You could start by perhaps not greeting new users with your fist, and at least waiting until they give you a legitimate reason to be pissed off.
Logged

LosE the Act cHildren

  • Groupie
  • **
  • Posts: 112
  • tasty goodness for the whole family
Re: Vote for your new mods
« Reply #18 on: October 11, 2007, 10:41:25 AM »

and the remaining users aren't asked to stop being themselves 

wow. if hurling abuse is "being themselves" im really quite worried.
Logged
"You're not sick, you're single!"

Chromefox

  • Stalker
  • ******
  • Posts: 3835
  • CRITICAL HIT!
Re: Vote for your new mods
« Reply #19 on: October 11, 2007, 10:43:44 AM »

wow. if hurling abuse is "being themselves" im really quite worried.
Did you finish my sentence? I said without being misunderstood.

EDIT: Ie: Yak could tell me to fuck off and it wouldn't be taken personally, because I understand the context. People who don't know us and who've never encountered such dry humor, sarcasm, and cynicism as runs rampant around here can and have taken words out of context and gotten unecessarily angsty/offended.
« Last Edit: October 11, 2007, 10:46:47 AM by Chromefox »
Logged

.

  • Having a difficult time with reality
  • ****
  • Posts: 10923
Re: Vote for your new mods
« Reply #20 on: October 11, 2007, 10:44:49 AM »

i don't agree with that at all yak
as I've already said, i viewed any general abuse regarding my "newbie" status as a rite of passage on this site.
BUT (wait... there's more!) bullying in real life is totally unacceptable. you seem to forget (or maybe you didn't) that people can be heartless cruel wankers. and it often doesn't "toughen you up", it just totally damages your self esteem.
don't worry, i know what bullying is like. I suffered it in school, and I now WORK at a school and  are disgusted with the things kids come up with. and its not just kids. there are teachers that throw around their weight in the staffroom.

yeah i suffered bullying at school too...but i actually think it made me a better person. it gave me motivation to go out and become better than those people, and eventually you get to an age where it dawns on you how pathetic it all was.

same at work - we have staff who demonstrate what could be considered as 'bullying' behaviour by some. however, i attribute my ability to deal with it/ignore it to my school experiences, which taught me to dismiss people who make me feel that way.

i mean..for god's sake...there was all this hoohah about bullying in the defence force..and one of the examples cited was that in a course, an officer had said "put your wanking wrench in the air" to allude that they needed to raise their hand if they had a question. unprofessional? maybe (though i think it's in keeping with aussie larikinism, myself). but bullying? pft. A bunch of female cadets also claimed they were 'bullied' because they were failed after not being able to carry a particular weight. I mean, ffs. We're not talking Martha Stewart's knitting club here - how the hell are they going to cope out on a battlefield if a mate gets shot and they are the only one that can drag them back to safety?

as i said before - there are some cases where bullying gets out of hand (e.g. physical abuse or some kinds of psych abuse) but when it comes to a bit of name calling or power posturing, it's easy to shake off, roll your eyes, and ignore it.

also, i think that people forget that 'bullying' requires a few criteria:
1) it's a repeated/ongoing issue
2) there's an imbalance of power that's being exploited in some way

children these days are being taught that if someone calls them a bad name, it's bullying. their parents are up at the school demanding that the 'bully' be reprimanded.
 
i think you'll find in this forum, that once a person cops their initial flame in their intro thread, they're generally accepted into the wider forum population with no major dramas (unless they're a complete dolt). and when you look at someone like loner, most of the flamers ended up having a bit of a soft spot for him.
Logged

Pinball Neil

  • Really not getting the hint
  • ********
  • Posts: 5635
Re: Vote for your new mods
« Reply #21 on: October 11, 2007, 11:03:51 AM »

Some kind of happy medium needs to be drawn where new users aren't getting curbstomped for illegitimate reasons, and the remaining users aren't asked to stop being themselves because some people don't take it the right way. You could start by perhaps not greeting new users with your fist, and at least waiting until they give you a legitimate reason to be pissed off.

Curse your bleeding heart!  8-)

i think you'll find in this forum, that once a person cops their initial flame in their intro thread, they're generally accepted into the wider forum population with no major dramas (unless they're a complete dolt).

And that's a good thing...

It *is* funny that most of the decent suggestions have been female posters. Kinda fits well - while the Chaser boys are out working, having fun doing their thing, the women are stuck at home looking after the kids. Society is great. :evil:
Logged
No more sleepovers on the bathroom floor.

Chromefox

  • Stalker
  • ******
  • Posts: 3835
  • CRITICAL HIT!
Re: Vote for your new mods
« Reply #22 on: October 11, 2007, 11:05:23 AM »

Curse your bleeding heart!  8-)
If all the new users get scared away, who is supposed to make me feel superior? =P
Logged

LosE the Act cHildren

  • Groupie
  • **
  • Posts: 112
  • tasty goodness for the whole family
Re: Vote for your new mods
« Reply #23 on: October 11, 2007, 11:14:05 AM »

i agree that some situations prepare you for life. If you can roll your eyes or make a witty and assertive comeback, you may have been "toughened up"

but i think there is a difference between successful bullying and unsuccessful bullying. if someone makes a comment to me in real life and i roll my eyes, i see that as unsuccessful bullying. they attempted to say something to make me feel smaller, but because i dont value their opinion it doesnt matter. remember if it didnt achieve the purpose of making you feel like shit, then the bully will try another option or give up.

successful (from the bully's point of view) is making the person feel like crap. really hitting a nerve. and making them (the bully) feel better about themselves. i dont believe there needs to be a power imbalance. you can be "equals" and the sole purpose of the bully was to MAKE themselves feel superior (maybe they feel intimidated by you and already feel inferior)

so no. bullying doesnt have to involve either of your criteria.

if someone at school calls a kid a bad name, they ARE reprimanded. Recently,there was a yr 12 girl in tears when she said that she was taking pole dancing classes (which are extremely popular these days!) and some yr 12 boy decided to call her a slut and a stripper. It was totally inappropriate. He may not have needed reprimanding, but he needed to see that it was inappropriate. My year 8 class say some of the most horrible things to this one girl who cut her hair short (apparently that makes her a lesbian - it definitely makes her a target)

i think your example of "bullying" of women in the defence force is actually discrimination. there's a difference. and sometimes, like you say, they need to put some discriminatory regulations in place for safety reasons.

yak - if you dont regard name calling as emotional abuse (which lasts a lot longer then a bruise) then we disagree on a fundamental issue.
Logged
"You're not sick, you're single!"

Star Fish

  • Outstaying welcome
  • *****
  • Posts: 1260
  • One man's fish is another man's poisson
Re: Vote for your new mods
« Reply #24 on: October 11, 2007, 11:15:03 AM »

i don't agree with that at all yak

as I've already said, i viewed any general abuse regarding my "newbie" status as a rite of passage on this site.

BUT (wait... there's more!) bullying in real life is totally unacceptable. you seem to forget (or maybe you didn't) that people can be heartless cruel wankers. and it often doesn't "toughen you up", it just totally damages your self esteem.


Some of what you say is true. For example, some people here can indeed be heartless, cruel wankers, and yes, the definition of bullying should include bullying over phone/internet/other media.

But what exactly is bullying? I mean, say for example that you are applying for a job and have written your application. You thought you wrote it well, but in reality it reads like crap. If you showed it to a friend of yours, what would you want them to say? Would you like them to tell you that you are a wonderful unique flower and that any employer who doesn't take you on is a mean bastard with personal issues, or, would you want them to tell you that you have written crap and you should redo it if you want to have any chance of success?

OK, there is a middle ground of constructive criticism, but I'd prefer my friends not to beat around the bush. In fact, a stranger listening to me and most of my mates talk to each other could easily assume we really were constantly insulting each other. And of course, what we say to each other would mostly be inappropriate to say to a stranger. However, that's the problem with the internet. We are largely all strangers (and, to pre-empt the inevitable, some of us are large strangers), so how do we treat each other? Do we go out of our way to be polite and try not to offend anyone and make everything warm and fuzzy, or do we take  the risk that others might actually want to join in a more intellectual discussion with a bit of banter, and some paying out if you do come across as sounding stupid?

None of this is to say there hasn't been actual bullying on this site. There has, and well before the current dramas. However, the current trend seems to be to label *any* negative comment as abuse and report it. The reaction in the Hothouse thread was extreme, but honestly, I thought Bludgers response was worse than Pertis. I mean, just telling someone to fuck off I think is worse than trying to be witty in explaining why the post (hypothetically) sucked. Yes, it did go too far, but I think it was a response to the overall influx of generally brainless intro threads. Hothouse didn't deserve it particularly, but seriously, some of the inanity that I have read lately has had me shaking my head in disbelief, and _some_ of the criticism directly at newbies has been, in my opinion, justified.

I'm also not sure about the "treat newbies with kid gloves" thing. At least not if it means treating them considerably differently to regulars. Lets go back to the example of my friends. As I said, most of what I say to them wouldn't be appropriate to say to strangers. But what about someone I know reasonably well and am starting to consider as a friend? Or even before I get to the stage of knowing them well, but they have potential as a friend? If they are going to fit in, they need to be able to take (or enjoy!) a bit of ribbing. Should we hide out true colours from them? If the culture of this place is that stupidity gets paid out, then I don't think it should matter if it's a newbie or a regular. I don't think there's a ritual hazing of newbies - quite a number of people here didn't experience it - but there is an intolerance of certain behaviours. Newbies are more susceptible because they are, well, new, but at what point then can you say, ok, they're a regular now, they can handle the criticism? Maybe they can't?

Anyway, this comes back to my original point. I'm not saying that we are right for wanting forum members here to be able to take a bit of slack. However, the owners of the site need to work out where they are going to draw the line and make it clear. My concern is that if you are too strict in what you term "abuse", you are going to end up with a forum full of wonderful unique flowers and mindless drivel, but everyone feels warm and fuzzy. If that happens, I, for one, wont be here. If you are too lenient, you lose a lot of newbies who could have made a worthwhile contribution. Again, there is no doubt some middle ground, but you are never going to keep absolutely everyone here happy...


Logged
*<><
PLEASE DO NOT DISTURB...

...I'm disturbed enough already

Pinball Neil

  • Really not getting the hint
  • ********
  • Posts: 5635
Re: Vote for your new mods
« Reply #25 on: October 11, 2007, 12:46:04 PM »

Some of what you say is true. For example, some people here can indeed be heartless, cruel wankers, and yes, the definition of bullying should include bullying over phone/internet/other media.

People can be unkind but usually people get what's coming to them.
Logged
No more sleepovers on the bathroom floor.

Thaluikhain

  • All too visible
  • *
  • Posts: 20339
Re: Vote for your new mods
« Reply #26 on: October 11, 2007, 05:05:06 PM »

for example; i find nothing someone says to me online offensive. they do not know me, they are not part of my life and they probably have 72 cats.

Even if they say you are being silly?


As an aside, about bullying...yeah, alot that stuff in the hothouse post was unwarranted, but there are times when it's alright to get a bit unfriendly with people.  Less now that GC has been banned...but she had a habit of spouting utter crap.  I mean that stuff about "if you want something enough, the universe will give it to you".  We should be allowed to make fun of people who say stuff like that. 

As another aside, that was more or less the basis of The Secret, which the Chaser made fun of, so I've got precedent.  And anyway, I mostly get along with GC, even if she's almost always wrong about everything.

There's a big difference between hassling a noob cause they are a noob, and pointing out that they are talking rubbish when they obviously are.  Of course, this is likely to end up as "they were talking rubbish cause they disagreed with me".
Logged

blue

  • Really not getting the hint
  • ********
  • Posts: 6626
    • New chat to be founded here-ish. Phew.
Re: Vote for your new mods
« Reply #27 on: October 11, 2007, 05:38:10 PM »

Hmmm, I think most people have already said their bit about the latest drama in about 8 different threads...

I think my bit was in 'ask the forum' after the Nate post that Star Fish posted.

Abridged version:

- Having 'lots' of mods is better than having only a few (The shittiness is shared, they can support each other, they are less likely to become individual targets, there's more likely to be a mod online when something is actually happening so it can be 'cleaned up' quicker, etc)

- As many as possible should be people who regularly post here and have a feel for the place. This forum would be harder to mod than many others, purely because most of us have a shared sense of humour for things which push boundaries and cross lines and all that...

Meh. I can't be bothered repeating myself just now, and going on past e-dramas I don't think we commoners get a say anyway  :-P
Logged

Wolfe Tone

  • Post count only Fadeaway is sad enough to achieve without cheating
  • *
  • Posts: 7513
  • Every single time I get high, I see mice.
Re: Vote for your new mods
« Reply #28 on: October 11, 2007, 08:44:10 PM »

but that's the *exact* reason we do it.

when we give people a bit of stick, it sorts the wheat from the chaff. the people with balls stick around and subsequently contribute (usually) half decent shit to conversations. so it's a baptism of fire...a rite of passage...and it's not like we're sodomising them with lit candles or anything like at Kings School :roll: we're telling them they're fucked for liking australian idol, ffs  :lol:

What are you talking about? I'm still here and the amonut of crap I spurt is the single biggest contributer to world polution.

and they don't always use lit candles at Xavier
Logged
Studying laws I don't particularly agree with to give back to a society i don't particularly like.

Doctor Squash!

  • Groupie
  • **
  • Posts: 115
  • it's lupus.
    • diahorrea of the mouth
Re: Vote for your new mods
« Reply #29 on: October 11, 2007, 08:58:25 PM »

Re. candles and Xavier, should I ask?

Also, I don't think it's necessarily true that all newbies get abused on entering the forum - it's easy not to, type properly and act like you have an I.Q. above fifty! It worked for me. . .
Logged
"Well, my days of taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle!"
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 11