chaserforum.net

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

All content is the responsibility of individual users. If concerned by any message, report it. Abuse not tolerated and will lead to banning. By using this site you agree to its rules.

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7]

Author Topic: Internets(tm) romance  (Read 5518 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Nick 2

  • Having a difficult time with reality
  • ****
  • Posts: 12340
  • Waiting for Ragnarok
Re: Internets(tm) romance
« Reply #90 on: September 12, 2007, 06:16:21 PM »

the love part is your decision

that's the most extraordinary thing i've read in a while  :|

i have a sneaky suspicion human emotions can't be switched on and off at the owner's discretion.
Logged

Lord Biscuit©

  • Having a difficult time with reality
  • ****
  • Posts: 13346
  • Just finished "Gullivers Travels"- needs more salt
Re: Internets(tm) romance
« Reply #91 on: September 12, 2007, 07:18:18 PM »

Ah, but according to Trukka, love is not an emotion. However, it's probably just the over-usage of the word that makes it confusing. If you're Greek, you could say Agape, which is probably better at explaining the concept.
Logged
for when you need to need to talk live, but not in person, and without emoticons.

Truckarella

  • Post count only Fadeaway is sad enough to achieve without cheating
  • *
  • Posts: 8343
  • I thought 'jocks and jacket, that'll do.'
Re: Internets(tm) romance
« Reply #92 on: September 12, 2007, 07:20:23 PM »

If you're Greek, you could possibly say 'half an hour of semi-consentual backdoor action' and you'd still be in the ballpark.

Mr Pants

  • Outstaying welcome
  • *****
  • Posts: 1750
Re: Internets(tm) romance
« Reply #93 on: September 12, 2007, 07:26:05 PM »

Whilst we're on this topic. I might as well ask, does anyone here want a root?

Just kidding, even I have standards.
Logged
When you feel like you've lost everything, you find out you can always lose a little more. - Bob Dylan

a passing lunatic

  • Outstaying welcome
  • *****
  • Posts: 1258
  • .. .. .. .. ..
Re: Internets(tm) romance
« Reply #94 on: September 12, 2007, 07:42:34 PM »

Just what I've been looking for, a guy with standards.

When shall we meet?
Logged
When I grow up, I wanna be a raving lunatic.

Star Fish

  • Outstaying welcome
  • *****
  • Posts: 1260
  • One man's fish is another man's poisson
Re: Internets(tm) romance
« Reply #95 on: September 12, 2007, 08:08:49 PM »


actually, a girl i went to school with did that. she was chatting to some american dude for a while on the net...he moved to australia...they got hitched and have a kid now...(she had one from a previous "relationship" as well)

he's the biggest archetypal piece of trailer trash you could imagine. apparently he belts her up etc. she grew up in the housing commission though, so i suppose it's normal for her.


Unfortunately you don't need to go onto the 'net to find one of those... A former friend of mine (we're not in touch now) had quite a collection of them...
Logged
*<><
PLEASE DO NOT DISTURB...

...I'm disturbed enough already

DiddlySquat

  • Stalker
  • ******
  • Posts: 3280
  • I am self-monitoring myself
Re: Internets(tm) romance
« Reply #96 on: September 12, 2007, 11:12:22 PM »

Obviously, most people have huge difficulty getting their mind around the fact that the Internets (with that cool TM thing) is the tool.

The bar, as in going to a bar to pick up, is the tool.

The personals column is the tool.

The club is the tool.

The friend's dinner party (oh and we also invited Kim who is lovely) is the tool.

It's all about tools, and not being one.
Logged
My fallibility is proof of my brilliance - DS

Lord Biscuit©

  • Having a difficult time with reality
  • ****
  • Posts: 13346
  • Just finished "Gullivers Travels"- needs more salt
Re: Internets(tm) romance
« Reply #97 on: September 12, 2007, 11:21:40 PM »

If you're Greek, you could possibly say 'half an hour of semi-consentual backdoor action' and you'd still be in the ballpark.
"ballpark"! Ha!
Logged
for when you need to need to talk live, but not in person, and without emoticons.

Nick 2

  • Having a difficult time with reality
  • ****
  • Posts: 12340
  • Waiting for Ragnarok
Re: Internets(tm) romance
« Reply #98 on: September 13, 2007, 12:09:28 PM »

damn you both :x
Logged

blue

  • Really not getting the hint
  • ********
  • Posts: 6626
    • New chat to be founded here-ish. Phew.
Re: Internets(tm) romance
« Reply #99 on: September 13, 2007, 01:13:40 PM »

Aww, Andy and Loon would make such a cute couple...

I just remembered another person I know who met someone over the net and got married. I assume they're still married because I haven't heard otherwise, so that'd make it about 3-4 years now. Met on the net, and he moved here from overseas. It's turned out to be a much better relationship than her previous marriage where they met in a more conventional manner.

I also know of two other people I used to know who've had international interweb relationships that didn't last once one of them moved to the other country.

As Diddly said, the interweb is just a tool. People who meet that way will still have either good or bad relationships, and all that.
Logged

brainfuzz

  • Junkie
  • ***
  • Posts: 281
    • myspace losers unite!
Re: Internets(tm) romance
« Reply #100 on: September 13, 2007, 06:55:07 PM »

Yeah it is just a tool, but I think there are differences between it and the real world that should make you a bit more wary before diving headfirst into it.

Having been an internerd since 94, I've had a fair bit of experience meeting people from the net. There *is* a big difference between starting a friendship/relationship with someone in the flesh and starting a friendship/relationship with someone online.

In the flesh, it's a lot easier to sus out dodgy fuckers and it's almost as though people are forced to be more "real" with you. Maybe this is because you've got all the body language, which makes up a massive percentage of how we communicate.

Online, it's so easy for people to "play a role" or be something they're not. Or, conversely, to construct an "image" of their e-love that may not necessarily be true.

Plus, emotions and behaviours tend to be amplified online. It's much easier to type emotion-filled text and send it out to a faceless ether, or to some e-Lothario that you've painted up to be something they're not. So I think that perhaps people sometimes get tricked by "being in love with the idea of being in love" as opposed to "being in love".

Anyway. It's not true love until you're comfortable enough to fart around one another. So love's impossible on the net  :lol:
Logged

Kinky Beatle

  • Sophomore
  • *
  • Posts: 45
Re: Internets(tm) romance
« Reply #101 on: September 14, 2007, 09:50:54 PM »

One of my best mates from school recently married a girl he met online.

I met a few back in the day, nothing to write home about though. None of this rsvp shit either, good old fashioned chat rooms.

Doubt i'd do it ever again though. I have no reason for saying that, just haven't for so long I don't see myself doing it again.
Logged

:-) Fred

  • Stalker
  • ******
  • Posts: 2063
  • Fred loves the ladies
Re: Internets(tm) romance
« Reply #102 on: September 14, 2007, 09:53:03 PM »

Haven't you got one of the new USB devices that transmits odour via the ethertube yet yak?
Logged
"By all means marry.
If you get a good wife, you'll become happy.
If you get a bad one, you'll become a philosopher."
- Socrates
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7]