chaserforum.net

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

All content is the responsibility of individual users. If concerned by any message, report it. Abuse not tolerated and will lead to banning. By using this site you agree to its rules.

Pages: [1] 2

Author Topic: Birthright  (Read 3498 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

JOEBIALEK

  • Fresher
  • *
  • Posts: 5
Birthright
« on: June 13, 2007, 11:58:26 AM »

Birthright is defined as a right, privilege, or possession, such as property, to which one is entitled by birth.   In his article "Taking Luck Seriously" Matt Miller suggests that birthright results in the "inherited package of wealth, health, genes, looks, brains, talents and family."   Approximately two-thirds {or more} of all wealth in the United States is inherited by birthright.   In a recent study conducted at Ohio State University's Center for Human Resource Research,  author Jay Zagorsky stated "Intelligence is not a factor for explaining wealth."   Therefore, one may draw the conclusion that most business and political leaders are not intelligent.  They did not earn their way into powerful positions but rather were manipulated into them because of birthright.  This further begs the question: then why are they in charge?  Why is it that our country is not run by the best and brightest?   Does the merit system stop when one graduates from school?   While intelligence is certainly not the only factor in determining who is most fit to lead our society, it is certainly a better measure than birthright.   In over two hundred years the United States has failed at overcoming one of the biggest barriers to a just society.   We refuse to find a way to limit the benefits of birthright and therefore make for a fairer {and better managed} society. 
 
"A Decade of Executive Excess,'' the sixth annual survey of executive compensation by the Institute for Policy Studies and United for a Fair Economy, finds the ratio of top executive to factory worker pay has exploded this decade from 42 to 1 in 1980 to 419 to 1 last year.   Why are we paying these people so much more if they don't have the intelligence and will to act in our best interest?   What tangible proof is there that top executives contribute that much more to the successful attainment of corporate goals?   Why aren't these executives {Enron} given longer prison terms than car thieves?   If intelligence determined corporate leadership rather than birthright, the compensation ratio would be much lower because smart leaders would recognize it as the right thing to do whereas those that are there by birthright simply don't know any better {or care}.   It is this ignorance perpetuated by birthright that is leading this country to collapse.   Perhaps someday our society will be lead by intelligent people who see their own best interest as having promoted society's best interest.
Logged

Lord Biscuit©

  • Having a difficult time with reality
  • ****
  • Posts: 13346
  • Just finished "Gullivers Travels"- needs more salt
Re: Birthright
« Reply #1 on: June 13, 2007, 12:07:35 PM »

Only an idiot would think intelligence and success were inextricably linked.

When a person is interviewed for a job, do you hire the smartest person despite the fact they are a complete wanker, or do you hire a moderately intelligent person who you 'click' with? The fact is, 'nice' or easy-going people enjoy far greater success in job interviews. This is not due to intelligence (unless you count 'emotional intelligence').

GWB wasn't voted in as US president because he was the smartest cookie in the jar. People just liked him (and by all accounts, he is a very likeable guy in person).

The ability to communicate effectively with a prospective customer or an audience is worth far more than any 'brain power' factor. If you ever meet with large corp CEOs or even ministers in person, you will realise what I mean.
Logged
for when you need to need to talk live, but not in person, and without emoticons.

DiddlySquat

  • Stalker
  • ******
  • Posts: 3280
  • I am self-monitoring myself
Re: Birthright
« Reply #2 on: June 13, 2007, 08:35:28 PM »

Especially ministers :-D

*Edit: excepting State Govt ministers, of course

*Edit Edit: Just because I didn't use teal or a smiley, doesn't necessarily mean that I wasn't being sarcastic
« Last Edit: June 13, 2007, 08:37:28 PM by DiddlySquat »
Logged
My fallibility is proof of my brilliance - DS

Thaluikhain

  • All too visible
  • *
  • Posts: 20339
Re: Birthright
« Reply #3 on: June 15, 2007, 05:14:36 PM »

Only an idiot would think intelligence and success were inextricably linked.

Well, there's success and then there's success.  I mean, Bush might seem successful, given that he is the "commnader of the free world" (irrespective of the fate that if we were free, we wouldn't have to do what he said)...but compared to other US Presidents, he's something of a failure.  In a few hundred years time, at best he'll be one of them boring guys that makes up the numbers of Presidents, at worse he'll be seen as Caligula on speed.
Logged

Lord Biscuit©

  • Having a difficult time with reality
  • ****
  • Posts: 13346
  • Just finished "Gullivers Travels"- needs more salt
Re: Birthright
« Reply #4 on: June 15, 2007, 06:58:36 PM »

You're splitting heirshairs there. No doubt there have been intelligent presidents, but it's clearly not a prerequisite
Logged
for when you need to need to talk live, but not in person, and without emoticons.

Thaluikhain

  • All too visible
  • *
  • Posts: 20339
Re: Birthright
« Reply #5 on: June 15, 2007, 08:54:13 PM »

No, I mean it is a requisite for any that are really successful.  You don't have to be smart to be a president, but if you aren't, you are going to plod along like Bush does.  To do well, you'd have to be smart.
Logged

Lord Biscuit©

  • Having a difficult time with reality
  • ****
  • Posts: 13346
  • Just finished "Gullivers Travels"- needs more salt
Re: Birthright
« Reply #6 on: June 15, 2007, 09:02:25 PM »

No, I mean it is a requisite for any that are really successful.  You don't have to be smart to be a president, but if you aren't, you are going to plod along like Bush does.  To do well, you'd have to be smart.
I guess Halle Berry would be pleased to hear that. Tom Cruise too.
Logged
for when you need to need to talk live, but not in person, and without emoticons.

Crux

  • Junkie
  • ***
  • Posts: 226
Re: Birthright
« Reply #7 on: June 16, 2007, 04:59:10 PM »

As much as leftwingers might want to pretend otherwise, success is purely based on how much money you have.
Logged

DiddlySquat

  • Stalker
  • ******
  • Posts: 3280
  • I am self-monitoring myself
Re: Birthright
« Reply #8 on: June 17, 2007, 06:43:39 PM »

As much as leftwingers might want to pretend otherwise, success is purely based on how much money you have.

Nob jockey
Logged
My fallibility is proof of my brilliance - DS

pseudonym

  • Really not getting the hint
  • ********
  • Posts: 4700
  • Studying to become unemployed since 2009
Re: Birthright
« Reply #9 on: June 17, 2007, 06:48:36 PM »

As much as leftwingers might want to pretend otherwise, success is purely based on how much money you have.

Really?  So Bo Diddly isn't a successful musician?  Mother Theresa wasn't a successful caregiver?  Jesus Christ wasn't a successful cult leader?

You're probably dirt poor, but you're a successful fuckwit.
Logged
If you were shot with poisoned arrows, you know what I'd do?  I'd fuck your dead body and poison myself.

DiddlySquat

  • Stalker
  • ******
  • Posts: 3280
  • I am self-monitoring myself
Re: Birthright
« Reply #10 on: June 17, 2007, 06:51:02 PM »

You're probably dirt poor, but you're a successful fuckwit.

Nah, skex is a successful shit-stirrer :-D
Logged
My fallibility is proof of my brilliance - DS

theye

  • Fresher
  • *
  • Posts: 5
Re: Birthright
« Reply #11 on: September 17, 2007, 05:37:22 PM »

Of course Intelligence and being successful isn't linked that would too difficult.
Logged

pseudonym

  • Really not getting the hint
  • ********
  • Posts: 4700
  • Studying to become unemployed since 2009
Re: Birthright
« Reply #12 on: September 17, 2007, 05:58:22 PM »

Of course Intelligence and being successful isn't linked that would too difficult.

Wow... thanks, theye.

So pleased that you decided to bump a 3-month-dead thread with a single sentence of badly punctuated, pointless diaharrea.

Cheers.
Logged
If you were shot with poisoned arrows, you know what I'd do?  I'd fuck your dead body and poison myself.

DiddlySquat

  • Stalker
  • ******
  • Posts: 3280
  • I am self-monitoring myself
Re: Birthright
« Reply #13 on: September 17, 2007, 06:00:44 PM »

Wow... thanks, theye.

So pleased that you decided to bump a 3-month-dead thread with a single sentence of badly punctuated, pointless diaharrea.

Cheers.

It was his/her cat walking across the keyboard.

If it keeps doing it, there's a possibility it could write The Bible. i.e. already it's close :-D
Logged
My fallibility is proof of my brilliance - DS

pseudonym

  • Really not getting the hint
  • ********
  • Posts: 4700
  • Studying to become unemployed since 2009
Re: Birthright
« Reply #14 on: September 17, 2007, 06:18:09 PM »

Now now diddles - the Bible isn't too badly puntuated is it?  :)
Logged
If you were shot with poisoned arrows, you know what I'd do?  I'd fuck your dead body and poison myself.
Pages: [1] 2