chaserforum.net

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

All content is the responsibility of individual users. If concerned by any message, report it. Abuse not tolerated and will lead to banning. By using this site you agree to its rules.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 5

Author Topic: Shameless upping of fangirlism.  (Read 4752 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Kelchables

  • Having a difficult time with reality
  • ****
  • Posts: 10124
Shameless upping of fangirlism.
« on: April 18, 2007, 10:58:39 PM »

it was needed. it was it was it was it was.


because...



I WANT ANDREW'S BABIES!!!!


squeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee *spins off on happy cloud made of god-knows what*
« Last Edit: April 18, 2007, 11:00:33 PM by Kelchables »
Logged

WithTheDawn

  • Stalker
  • ******
  • Posts: 2155
Re: Shameless upping of fangirlism.
« Reply #1 on: April 18, 2007, 11:10:43 PM »

Andrews babies mother might not be too happy about that. What are you going to do, eat them? You sick bitch.
Logged
I know the croaking chorus from The Frogs of Aristophanes.

Keridwen

  • Really not getting the hint
  • ********
  • Posts: 4159
    • House's House of Whining
Re: Shameless upping of fangirlism.
« Reply #2 on: April 18, 2007, 11:35:52 PM »

hahaha go Kelch... eat them!!!

Hey WTD this would be a perfect place to post the pictures........
Logged

Philosopher

  • Tragic
  • ****
  • Posts: 805
  • Hmm... Interesting
    • My MSN blog
Re: Shameless upping of fangirlism.
« Reply #3 on: April 19, 2007, 02:14:45 AM »

Why would you want his babies? Babies are much harder to look after. True you get to keep them longer, but older are generally tamer.

No, no, much better to have the man himself. He'd be much easier to look after I would think. Though you'd have to show him who's boss, or he might make trouble! Especially since he would miss his old ways and family and friends and everything.

 :wink:

(In case you can't tell, I'm being silly)
« Last Edit: April 19, 2007, 02:17:53 AM by Philosopher »
Logged

Keridwen

  • Really not getting the hint
  • ********
  • Posts: 4159
    • House's House of Whining
Re: Shameless upping of fangirlism.
« Reply #4 on: April 19, 2007, 02:19:44 AM »

Silly? That's impossible!  :roll:
Logged

Lord Biscuit©

  • Having a difficult time with reality
  • ****
  • Posts: 13346
  • Just finished "Gullivers Travels"- needs more salt
Re: Shameless upping of fangirlism.
« Reply #5 on: April 19, 2007, 11:35:41 AM »

I believe all Kelch was trying to say is that one day she hopes to become a nanny. That's all.
Logged
for when you need to need to talk live, but not in person, and without emoticons.

dorme

  • Stalker
  • ******
  • Posts: 2140
  • grrrrooowl.......
    • Jac The Myspace Whore!
Re: Shameless upping of fangirlism.
« Reply #6 on: April 19, 2007, 01:01:13 PM »

I believe all Kelch was trying to say is that one day she hopes to become a nanny. That's all.

 :lol:
and this is why i love you bics!
Logged
Do you know what nemesis means? It is a righteous infliction of retribution manifested by an appropriate agent, personified in this case by an 'orrible cu.nt, ME.

Kelchables

  • Having a difficult time with reality
  • ****
  • Posts: 10124
Re: Shameless upping of fangirlism.
« Reply #7 on: April 19, 2007, 03:54:20 PM »

i hate you all.  :x


just ruin my happy-go-lucky fangirl thread with your stupid playful purposeful ignorance of what I really[/]i want.


Logged

Philosopher

  • Tragic
  • ****
  • Posts: 805
  • Hmm... Interesting
    • My MSN blog
Re: Shameless upping of fangirlism.
« Reply #8 on: April 19, 2007, 04:08:12 PM »

i hate you all.  :x


just ruin my happy-go-lucky fangirl thread with your stupid playful purposeful ignorance of what I really[/]i want.




Aw, there there, if I write a non-explicit fanfic (so that it's ok to post on the forums) that involves the fangirls and Andrew Hansen and post it to this thread, would that make you happy?
Logged

dorme

  • Stalker
  • ******
  • Posts: 2140
  • grrrrooowl.......
    • Jac The Myspace Whore!
Re: Shameless upping of fangirlism.
« Reply #9 on: April 19, 2007, 05:04:13 PM »

except if andrew did get with one of the fangirls i'm pretty sure he'd go to jail(most of the fangirls are under 16 right?)
Logged
Do you know what nemesis means? It is a righteous infliction of retribution manifested by an appropriate agent, personified in this case by an 'orrible cu.nt, ME.

Kelchables

  • Having a difficult time with reality
  • ****
  • Posts: 10124
Re: Shameless upping of fangirlism.
« Reply #10 on: April 19, 2007, 05:21:11 PM »

no Philo, that'd be weird. and I have the English skills to do that myself if need be.


and Dorme-san, I'm not under 16, and I'm the only one who would REALLY matters right?  :wink:
Logged

Philosopher

  • Tragic
  • ****
  • Posts: 805
  • Hmm... Interesting
    • My MSN blog
Re: Shameless upping of fangirlism.
« Reply #11 on: April 19, 2007, 07:24:47 PM »

except if andrew did get with one of the fangirls i'm pretty sure he'd go to jail(most of the fangirls are under 16 right?)

I said non-explicit, and by that I meant Andrew wouldn't get with any of them. It would have been an action fanfic, where he's kidnapped by some evil person and all the fangirls get together and rescue him, or something equally lame, but safe for younger people to read.

If I was going to a fic suggestive of Andrew getting with any of them, I'd toss out all the characters under 18, and who would be left then?
Logged

Kelchables

  • Having a difficult time with reality
  • ****
  • Posts: 10124
Re: Shameless upping of fangirlism.
« Reply #12 on: April 19, 2007, 08:59:44 PM »

If I was going to a fic suggestive of Andrew getting with any of them, I'd toss out all the characters under 18 except Kelchables, and who would be left then but Kelch to comfort him in the long cold, cold, heartless nights?
Logged

Keridwen

  • Really not getting the hint
  • ********
  • Posts: 4159
    • House's House of Whining
Re: Shameless upping of fangirlism.
« Reply #13 on: April 19, 2007, 09:23:25 PM »

I said non-explicit, and by that I meant Andrew wouldn't get with any of them. It would have been an action fanfic, where he's kidnapped by some evil person and all the fangirls get together and rescue him, or something equally lame, but safe for younger people to read.

That's funny. Most of the TV fanfics I've ever read have the bunch of crazy fangirls kidnap the character and some normal people saving them. Or no-one saving them at all. Actually, its usually the fangirls writing them so therefore they aren't going to want to save the main character from themselves are they?

Photos, WTD!!!
Logged

Philosopher

  • Tragic
  • ****
  • Posts: 805
  • Hmm... Interesting
    • My MSN blog
Re: Shameless upping of fangirlism.
« Reply #14 on: April 19, 2007, 11:10:38 PM »

That's funny. Most of the TV fanfics I've ever read have the bunch of crazy fangirls kidnap the character and some normal people saving them. Or no-one saving them at all. Actually, its usually the fangirls writing them so therefore they aren't going to want to save the main character from themselves are they?

Yes, but that's only good for fanfics where you want to detail what happens to the main character. I would do a fanfic like that if all the characters were going to be 18+, but if I were to do such a thing, then I couldn't post it here.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 5