Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[thebgirl]

DEPENDS!!

Depends on what?

[LadyDee]

I dont think you should judge people for any reason, although and unfortuantely I am guilty of doing it myself. I dont think its a matter of hiding something, but rather acknowledging that all humans are capable of all things and therefore whatever we judge someone by will be used to judge us, and since we are capable of the same greatness and the same weakness we should assist each other not pull each other down.


I do think people should take responsibility for their actions, but if they dont for whatever reason, then they warrent assistant, not condemnation.

[bureaucrat]

I judge people continuously, because I think Im better than they are.  


Im hotter than them...


Im funnier than them...


In fact, Im just a whole round better representation of the human species.  People should become more like me.


There, fascist enough for you??  

hmm... not sure.


 

[bureaucrat]

I dont think you should judge people for any reason, although and unfortuantely I am guilty of doing it myself. I dont think its a matter of hiding something, but rather acknowledging that all humans are capable of all things and therefore whatever we judge someone by will be used to judge us, and since we are capable of the same greatness and the same weakness we should assist each other not pull each other down.


I do think people should take responsibility for their actions, but if they dont for whatever reason, then they warrent assistant, not condemnation.

oh la! youre on the tragic status. and i think it reflects ur post too. you cant get moral on us. its not allowed and totally unacceptable.

[LadyDee]

There are other ways to bring about positive changes then challenging those who have the weapons. Having said that though it takes immense courage to believe that your ideals are supreme to yourself, and that is admirable.

[bureaucrat]

I judge people continuously, because I think Im better than they are.  


Im hotter than them...


Im funnier than them...


In fact, Im just a whole round better representation of the human species.  People should become more like me.


There, fascist enough for you??  

hmm... not sure.


 

hmm, I thought bureaucrats were supposed to be able to make decisions.  Not sure just doesnt cut it.  Bureaucrat, youre fired!


(Just getting in Apprentice mode )

Dear Mr Fadeaway,


I refer to you to the comments above.


I will seriously reconsider your comments and concerns, and will inform you, if and when, I make a decision on the matter.


Sincerely,


Bureaucrat.

[LadyDee]

Very red tapish. Now you need to refer that to the appropriate department, assemble a committee to assess the pros and cons, have the committee refer an undecided verdit, assemble an investigative committee which will return a verdict that there was nothing serious of note, have the department refer it back to you, and then reply.

[thebgirl]

Bad things are masked by good ideas, but the good ideas are usually far from the wrong doing.

Actually, a really good historical example of that is the Crusades.

[Emperor Fadeaway]

Very red tapish. Now you need to refer that to the appropriate department, assemble a committee to assess the pros and cons, have the committee refer an undecided verdit, assemble an investigative committee which will return a verdict that there was nothing serious of note, have the department refer it back to you, and then reply.

Bureaucracy is all about 50 people making 150 decisions, when a single person making a single decision would have sufficed.  But hey, keeps people off the dole queue, right?


Oh, and Im not expecting a reply either.  

[bureaucrat]

Very red tapish. Now you need to refer that to the appropriate department, assemble a committee to assess the pros and cons, have the committee refer an undecided verdit, assemble an investigative committee which will return a verdict that there was nothing serious of note, have the department refer it back to you, and then reply.

thats assuming my colleagues and i will even get around to sending the concerns to the appropriate department.

[bureaucrat]

Very red tapish. Now you need to refer that to the appropriate department, assemble a committee to assess the pros and cons, have the committee refer an undecided verdit, assemble an investigative committee which will return a verdict that there was nothing serious of note, have the department refer it back to you, and then reply.

Bureaucracy is all about 50 people making 150 decisions, when a single person making a single decision would have sufficed.  But hey, keeps people off the dole queue, right?


Oh, and Im not expecting a reply either.  

its your lucky day. this is a reply. but dont expect any relevant or useful content in this reply.

[Emperor Fadeaway]

 I wasnt expecting a reply, but I was expecting that on the very slim possibility that a reply would be forthcoming, it would contain no useful information.


But thanks for replying!

[bureaucrat]

we aim to please.

[stickman67]

Or as they say on very polite firing squads: "Were pleased to aim!"

[Erica]

LOL